Powerless No More? Abiy Ahmed’s Limited Control Over Tigray–Eritrea Border Reopening
Updated July 2025

On early July 2025, the under-construction border crossing at Zalambessa reopened in a ceremony notably absent of Tigrayan or Eritrean officials—and without the participation of Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed. The omission highlights his currently limited sway in Horn‑of‑Africa diplomacy.
1. Background: Zalambessa’s Strategic Importance
The Zalambessa crossing links Ethiopia’s Tigray region with Eritrea—two areas historically locked in civil conflict. Following the end of the Tigray War in 2022, international observers and negotiators urged reopening border posts like Zalambessa to facilitate trade, reconstruction, and humanitarian relief see timeline. Its reactivation could turbocharge economic recovery in Tigray and reshape Ethiopia–Eritrea relations.
2. Ceremony Without Political Heavyweights
The event proceeded under the oversight of regional commanders and local technocrats, leaving out national government figures. Neither Abiy’s federal government nor top Eritrean or Tigrayan ministers were present—a political statement that control rests at regional, not federal, levels. Analysts suggest this undercuts Abiy’s authority in high-stakes diplomacy.
3. Abiy Ahmed’s Diplomatic Constraints
Abiy earned the 2019 Nobel Peace Prize for easing Ethiopia–Eritrea tensions, but his influence has since waned due to:
- Federal–regional friction: The Tigray Regional Government asserts autonomy, sidelining Addis Ababa.
- Security concerns: Ethiopian federal troops have limited presence near the border due to ongoing securitization.
- External mediation: Eritrea and influential regional figures are reasserting control.
These dynamics suggest Abiy’s central government may no longer define the regional agenda unilaterally.
4. Implications for Regional Relations
The reopening of Zalambessa without federal engagement may:
- Empower Tigrayan institutions: Their role underscores de facto autonomy in regional matters.
- Embed Eritrean influence: As control consolidates across the border, Eritrea safeguards its strategic interests.
- Shift diplomatic balance: Abiy’s absent role may diminish Addis Ababa’s regional leverage.
5. What This Means for Abiy’s Domestic Position
Domestically, Abiy faces mounting criticism: opponents point to his reduced role and regional fragmentation as threats to federal unity. Meanwhile, support from Oromo and Amhara constituencies may soften internal blow—yet long-term cohesion depends on restoring federal imprimatur in regional diplomacy.
6. What Comes Next for Horn of Africa Diplomacy?
- Federal intervention: Expect Addis to seek formal recognition of the border crossing and propose a federal monitoring mechanism.
- Regional integration: Tigray may pursue independent trade frameworks with Eritrea and international partners.
- International mediation: The US, EU, AU, and UN will likely intensify diplomatic outreach to ensure cohesion and stability.
- Security cooperation: Cross-border patrols and offices may emerge to curb smuggling and militant movement.

Conclusion: A Litmus Test for Abiy’s Authority
The Zalambessa reopening, without Abiy Ahmed’s presence, signals a pivotal shift: regional actors in Tigray and Eritrea are increasingly shaping cross-border policy, sidelining federal influence. The months ahead will test Ethiopia’s territorial integrity, federal cohesion, and the PM’s ability to reclaim strategic diplomatic ground.
Follow our Horn of Africa Diplomacy Tracker for live coverage on border developments, regional summits, and evolving alliances.
Related Coverage
- Zalambessa Reopening Explained
- Abiy Ahmed’s Diplomatic Challenges Post-Tigray War
- Tigray Regional Autonomy & Ethiopia’s Federal Future
Table of Contents
this post by africaintelligence.com
for more news visit our website